Week 17/2025

“It is certainly not what you would call a spectacle of entertainment,” wrote author and self-proclaimed “filmatic” Johan Daisne in his anthology Zien en zijn on Bresson’s 1956 film Un condamné à mort s’est échappé. What initially reads as criticism, Daisne quickly reframes as high praise: hardly ever before had a film so accurately, yet so austerely, portrayed the stifled terrors of war. Screening this Tuesday in De Cinema, Bresson’s masterpiece tells the story of Lieutenant Fontaine, who is imprisoned during the German occupation and awaits execution in a small prison cell. The title of the film gives away its ending: after meticulously planning his escape, Fontaine manages to free himself and avoid a gruesome death. Yet, despite the foregone outcome, the film never fails to be suspenseful. The purity and asceticism Bresson aimed for, as described by Daisne, cements the film as a great avant-garde breakthrough that is relentlessly realistic. “After all,” he writes, “cinema is the art of the greatest approximation to reality.”

Pier Paolo Pasolini, who was violently murdered on a beach in Ostia fifty years ago this year, dedicated a large part of his career to the relation of cinema and reality, informed by his own take on semiotic theory. In Il Vangelo secondo Matteo, screening this Wednesday at KASKcinema, the issue of realism plays one of the leading roles. Presenting to the viewer a riddle of religion and naturalism, this atheist rendition of Matthew’s gospel features biblical characters who are almost startlingly human, stripped of divine aura, grounded in everyday gestures and emotions, and nearly completely demystified. 

This Thursday, CINEMATEK will screen the documentary Which Side Are You On? as part of the Classics and Anthologies series, spotlighting British filmmaker Ken Loach. One of his rare documentaries, the film centres on the infamous 1984 Miner’s Strike. It depicts British miners and their families as they strike against the drastic policies imposed by the Thatcher government, measures that caused a large number of them to lose their jobs. Although he is best known and acclaimed for his social realism, Loach shows an almost poetic side to his filmmaker here in what is one of his only documentaries. He uses a collage of not only pictures and words, but also renditions of songs and poems to chronicle a pivotal moment in British labor history and the violent laws that changed the lives of millions for the worse.

Un condamné à mort s’est échappé ou Le vent souffle où il veut

In 1943, Lieutenant Fontaine is arrested by the Gestapo for involvement with the French Resistance and incarcerated at Montluc prison in Lyons. Immediately, Fontaine becomes obsessed with the idea of escape. He has nothing to lose. It is only a matter of time before he will be executed by the Nazis. With a spoon, sharpened into an improvised chisel, Fontaine painstakingly dismantles the door to his top floor cell. He then makes a rope from blankets and the wire mesh of his bed. Just as he is about to make his bid for freedom, another prisoner is placed in his cell, a young Frenchman who deserted after joining the German army. Fontaine now faces a terrible dilemma. He must decide whether to take his young cellmate into his confidence or kill him...

 

“Cinematography worth admiring—as a new means of expression—has yet to find its poets. Which isn’t surprising in this age of disorder, anarchy, and insensitivity to form. Still, one day we will have to learn to be as expressive with the camera as with the paintbrush or the pen. A film ought to be the work of an individual and invite the audience into the world of that individual—I mean into a world that belongs to that individual alone. I have an elevated view of cinematography. It’s impossible for me to imagine that it will remain forever a means of reproduction (filmed theater) as opposed to a means of expression.”

Robert Bresson1

 

Cahiers du Cinéma: The mysticism that many of us see in your film: Did you put it there, did it introduce itself without your control, or is it not there in your opinion?

Robert Bresson: I don’t know what you mean by mysticism. What you’re labeling mysticism must come from what I feel inside a prison—that is, as the subtitle of the film suggests (“The wind blows where it wants to”), these extraordinary currents, the presence of something, or Someone, call it what you will, which makes it seem as if there’s a hand directing everything. Prisoners are very sensitive to this peculiar atmosphere, which is not, by the way, a dramatic atmosphere at all: it exists on a much higher plane. There’s no apparent drama in a prison: you hear people being shot, but you don’t react visibly to it. All the drama is interior. Of course, from a material point of view I was attempting to portray this peculiar atmosphere by way of the contact between prisoners: Three words are spoken, and a life is suddenly changed. That’s how it is in prison.

Why is it that for each of the characters we have some idea about where they come from, about their relationship to the outside world, except for the central character, who seems to have no ties?

He has no ties because he has us. In fact, what gives us the sense of being with him is the fact that fundamentally, we don’t know any more about him than he knows about himself.

Cahiers du Cinéma in conversation with Robert Bresson2

 

Un condamné à mort s’est échappé ou Le vent souffle où il veut (Robert Bresson, 1956)

  • 1Unifrance Film, “A New Means of Expression. An Interview with Robert Bresson,” in Bresson on Bresson. Interviews 1943-1983, edited by Mylène Bresson (New York: New York Review Books, 2016). Originally published in Unifrance Film, 45, December 1957.
  • 2Rodolphe-Maurice Arlaud, André Bazin, Louis Marcorelles, Denis Marion, Georges Sadoul, Jean-Louis Tallenay, and François Truffaut, The Wind Blows Where It Wants To,” in Bresson on Bresson. Interviews 1943-1983, edited by Mylène Bresson (New York: New York Review Books, 2016). Originalky published in Cahiers du Cinéma, October 1957.
screening
De Cinema, Antwerp
Il vangelo secondo Matteo
The Gospel According to Matthew

Starting from his Immaculate Conception, the life of Jesus is retraced according to the Gospel of St. Matthew. When Jesus begins to travel through Palestine with his disciples to spread the word of God, the Romans conspire to have him silenced, leading to his arrest, crucifixion, and resurrection.

EN

Vangelo is contemplative and reverential, but it is a film about humans, not God. Jesus appears authentically human, unconcerned with his divine nature. The miraculous aspects of his story are downplayed, in favor of a more humanistic approach. Although miracles are shown – the loaves and the fishes, Christ walking on water, the final Resurrection – they seem more like an afterthought than central elements of Christ’s story. By rendering biblical characters as Italian peasants, Pasolini demystifies them, providing a more realistic view of biblical events than the Hollywood epics. Yet some of the film’s elements, notably its music (as well as its costumes, modeled on Byzantine and Renaissance paintings), somewhat counteract Pasolini’s attempts to render a more natural, contemporary view of biblical events, infusing Vangelo with a sense of reverence, majesty, and grandiosity, and also of universality.”

Mark Brill1

  • 1Mark Brill, “The Consecration of the Marginalized: Pasolini's Use of J. S. Bach in Accattone (1961) and Il Vangelo Secondo Matteo (1964),” Bach 50, Nr. 2 (2019): 220-253.

NL

“Het uitsterven van de dialecten onder invloed van de eenvormige stemmen van de massamedia wordt misschien aangekondigd in de eindeloze stoet stille gezichten uit Il vangelo secondo Matteo die hun hoofd draaien om naar Jezus te luisteren: als zij ‘hedendaags’ Italiaans zouden spreken, zou hun schoonheid vernield worden. In het midden van de jaren zestig probeert Pasolini’s cinema de laatste sporen van een uitstervende cultuur te bewaren, zelfs wanneer de bourgeoisie zich bemoeizuchtig opdringt met haar eindeloze vragen en haar honger naar spektakel, zoals aan het eind van La ricotta.”

Nina Power1

screening
KASKcinema, Ghent
Which Side Are You On?
Ken Loach, 1984, 53’

Songs, poems and experiences of the Miners' Strike, 1984.

EN

“The miners had featured prominently in Loach’s television work over the years, not because of his family background, but through the way they represented working-class struggle. ‘I didn’t know my uncles well on my father’s side – they died young,’ the director explained. ‘However, as always, there was great warmth shown to us when we met people during the strike. It’s easy to forget the extraordinary comradeship of those times.’”

Anthony Hayward1

  • 1Anthony Hayward, Which Side Are You On? Ken Loach and His Films (London: Bloomsbury, 2004), 197.
screening
CINEMATEK, Brussels
This Week
-