Éric Rohmer: La collectionneuse
“A woman is the opposite of a dandy. A woman is natural, which is to say abominable. She is always vulgar, too, and therefore she is the opposite of a dandy.” Adrien and Daniel would certainly confirm this statement by Baudelaire with regard to Haydée – always in the presence of others! The three of them meet by chance at a rich friend’s villa on the Côte d’Azur. Adrien is an art dealer, Daniel a painter. Haydée’s sole occupation seems to be to sleep with as many men as possible. Distraction incarnate, Haydée is a thorn in the side of Adrien and Daniel, who had wanted to devote their holiday entirely to concentration. Her mere presence disrupts their carefully staged holiday isolation. A commentary that places the events in the past, spoken by Adrien and pushed in front of the images from a distance, not only has the characteristic traits of a written text but also interprets the images so subjectively that another position remains possible for the spectator at all times. The film only comes into being when the conflicting strands of text and image meet in the spectator. With this film, Rohmer has made literature visible: how it relates to life. The dandies at the end of the eighteenth century artificialised their lives by trying to turn them into works of art. Daniel, the painter in the film, is also a painter in life. The small, razor-blade-studded can of paint that we see at the beginning of the film was recently part of an exhibition in a Parisian gallery; Daniel comments on his subject: “Painting is supposed to cut one’s fingers.” For him and Rohmer, it’s about bringing the kind of art to life that’s no good for museums. To use an image from the film: vases are primarily there to put flowers in.
Image from La collectionneuse (Éric Rohmer, 1967)
This text originally appeared as “Éric Rohmer: La collectionneuse,” in Filmkritik 11, no. 8, 128th issue from the complete series (August 1967): 430.